Relating to Stimuli.

How does a human being relate to stimuli, or in other words, how should a human being relate, pertaining to stimuli? Should the relation to the stimuli be personal, or otherwise? What is the term 'personal' to infer in relation to the previous sentence? Is it best not to relate to a stimuli in a manner, which disparages the possibilities of existence of other stimuli? When do we become personal towards a stimuli? All stimuli are associated with the self. When we perceive a stimuli, we are the perceiver of the stimuli, and we are also the perceived stimuli, as we are perceiving the stimuli. But are we the perceived stimuli, or are we our perception? How are we connected to the perception, by what we perceive, and what is perceived, and how we perceive? Are we the perceived stimuli, as we perceive the stimuli? Can it be, that our perception is equally how we perceive, and what we perceive according to our perception, and what the perception is in reality? Or in other words, are we perceiving the truth, completely, but we are not ready to accept it, because we are looking at either what we perceive, or how we perceive, or what is perceived, or a combination of any two of the values of perception, mentioned, instead of all three? Does any perception consist of all the three values mentioned? If it was so, if it is not, then how would our perception work for us? If our perception has to do with it's incompleteness, then why is that so? Perhaps, we are very to do with furthering our perception, instead of perceiving, if we should, completely. We perhaps, feel inadequate about our perception, any perception, and when we believe in our perceptions, then we are perhaps conscious of our beliefs. Is this not a lack of our powers of perception? Does any person feel that he is very perceptive anytime?